ednews1
 
 The Internet's #1 source for Education News and Information
Search
 
EdNews.org  
Site Archives
Web
Categories
Article Options
Your Favorite Articles
View All Favorites
Articles to Read
You Recently Viewed...
Popular Articles
  1. In the Aftermath of the Inspector General's Report on Reading First: Why the Silence on Reading Recovery's Standing among Reading Researchers?
  2. An Interview with Frank Wang: About The Beauty of Mathematics
  3. Robbing Parents to Pay Teachers
  4. A Bad AP Teacher?
  5. Margaret Spellings is a Piece of Work
No popular articles found.
Popular Authors
  1. Michael F. Shaughnessy Senior Columnist EdNews.org
  2. Washington Post
  3. Ed News
  4. Robert Oliphant Columnist EdNews.org
  5. New York Times (registration required)
  6. Boston Globe
  7. Los Angeles Times
  8. Sandra Stotsky Columnist EdNews.org
  9. Daniel Pryzbyla Columnist EdNews.org
  10. Houston Chronicle
No popular authors found.
 »  Home  »  Commentaries and Reports  »  Getting Farther Ahead by Staying Behind:
Getting Farther Ahead by Staying Behind:
By Manhattan Institute | Published  09/18/2006 | Commentaries and Reports | Rating:
Getting Farther Ahead by Staying Behind: A Second-Year Evaluation of Florida's Policy to End Soc

Jay P. Greene, Ph.D.
Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research

Marcus A. Winters
Senior Research Associate, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research

This study evaluates Florida's state-wide test-based promotion policy on student achievement two years after initial retention. The authors find that retained Florida students made significant reading gains relative to the control group of socially promoted students. Students who are socially promoted, without having mastered basic skills for the grade they completed, fall farther behind over time. Conversely, retained students are able to catch up on skills they are lacking.

The authors also address discrepancies in research findings on test-based promotion policies in Florida and Chicago. They conclude that differences between Chicago and Florida evaluations are caused by differences in details of the programs, not by differences in how programs were evaluated.

Access this publication


How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent

Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img


Add comment
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by Mary Reimer)
    Rating
    The link did not work
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by h schmelzer)
    Rating
    link does not work there fore can not get above a minimal value.
     
Submit Comment